iconcharts

Android Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Samsung SM-F966B

General information and performance details for Samsung SM-F966B can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Samsung SM-F966B

CPU Type: QTI SM8750

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 11664.4 MB

Average CPU Mark: 12,584

Average Mem Mark: 37,690

Average Disk Mark: 296,341

Average 2D Mark: 72,071

Average 3D Mark: 69,464

Average PassMark Rating
26,086

Rank: 12
Samples: 29

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jul 31 2025

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 19th of August 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Vivo V2507A
13,422
Samsung SM-F971B
12,953
Samsung SM-F966B
12,584
Zebra Technologies TC501
8,270
Samsung SM-A3760
7,579
Zebra Technologies TC53E
5,425
Vivo I2404
5,245
Samsung SM-A176U
4,399
Xiaomi 2508CRN2BI
2,413
ZTE Z2466
1,415


Last 5 Baselines for Samsung SM-F966B
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8118633 - Jul 22 2026
23310
BL8117903 - Jun 20 2026
26633
BL8117627 - Jun 08 2026
29491
BL8117538 - Jun 06 2026
21348
BL8117537 - Jun 06 2026
21348