iconcharts

Android Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Samsung SM-F966W

General information and performance details for Samsung SM-F966W can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Samsung SM-F966W

CPU Type: QTI SM8750

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 11114.3 MB

Average CPU Mark: 12,065

Average Mem Mark: 31,961

Average Disk Mark: 250,154

Average 2D Mark: 67,832

Average 3D Mark: 67,867

Average PassMark Rating
23,622

Rank: 47
Samples: 4

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Aug 12 2025

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 20th of July 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Vivo V2537
12,292
Samsung SM-F966W
12,065
Moorechip Retroid Pocket 6
10,664
motorola edge 60 neo
7,247
Realme RMX5116
5,523
Realme RMX5111
4,468
TCL T517F
3,159
CTD-7000
2,508
Rockchip LVK3566FZ-60
1,000
Alps S26_Ultra
379


Last 4 Baselines for Samsung SM-F966W
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8117285 - May 29 2026
22657
BL8110910 - Dec 31 2025
20332
BL8103841 - Aug 30 2025
28952
BL8102710 - Aug 12 2025
22548