iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Micromax A102

General information and performance details for Micromax A102 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Micromax A102

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 116

Average Mem Mark: 1,619

Average Disk Mark: 46,648

Average 2D Mark: 1,492

Average 3D Mark: 2,029

Average CPU Mark (V3): 665*

Average PassMark Rating
168

Rank: 5342
Samples: 1

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jun 22 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 25th of September 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi 23046RP50C
 8,380
Sony XQ-DQ72
 7,807
Xiaomi 23078RKD5C
 7,725
Samsung SM-E546B
 6,169
Vivo V2048A
 5,551
Incar Npad-Pro
 3,335
Wheatek RT5
 3,315
Xiaomi 23076PC4BI
 2,946
LGE LM-Q630N
 2,006
Micromax A102
 116
PassMark Software © 2023


Last 1 Baselines for Micromax A102
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL802160 - Jun 22 2020 [OLD V3]
168
PassMark Software © 2023