iconcharts

Android Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Samsung G965F

General information and performance details for Samsung G965F can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Samsung G965F

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 480

Average Mem Mark: 3,663

Average Disk Mark: 17,237

Average 2D Mark: 5,524

Average 3D Mark: 4,941

Average CPU Mark (V3): 2,750*

Average PassMark Rating
1,095

Rank: 4858
Samples: 3

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Dec 21 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 19th of August 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Vivo V2507A
 13,422
Samsung SM-F971B
 12,953
Zebra Technologies TC501
 8,270
Samsung SM-A3760
 7,579
Zebra Technologies TC53E
 5,425
Vivo I2404
 5,245
Samsung SM-A176U
 4,399
Xiaomi 2508CRN2BI
 2,413
ZTE Z2466
 1,415
Samsung G965F
 480
PassMark Software © 2026


Last 3 Baselines for Samsung G965F
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL821835 - Jan 09 2021 [OLD V3]
967
BL819909 - Dec 21 2020 [OLD V3]
1158
BL819908 - Dec 21 2020 [OLD V3]
1158
PassMark Software © 2026