iconcharts

Android Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1609

General information and performance details for Vivo 1609 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Vivo 1609

Model Variants: vivo 1609

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 962

Average Mem Mark: 4,879

Average Disk Mark: 9,376

Average 2D Mark: 7,887

Average 3D Mark: 5,618

Average CPU Mark (V3): 5,516*

Average PassMark Rating
2,068

Rank: 4266
Samples: 2

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Oct 12 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 7th of September 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Vivo V2507A
13,422
Samsung SM-F971B
12,953
Zebra Technologies TC501
8,270
Samsung SM-A3760
7,579
Zebra Technologies TC53E
5,425
Vivo I2404
5,245
Samsung SM-A176U
4,399
Xiaomi 2508CRN2BI
2,413
ZTE Z2466
1,415
Vivo 1609
962


Last 2 Baselines for Vivo 1609
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL812587 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068
BL812586 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068