iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1609

General information and performance details for Vivo 1609 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Vivo 1609

Model Variants: vivo 1609

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 962

Average Mem Mark: 4,879

Average Disk Mark: 9,376

Average 2D Mark: 7,887

Average 3D Mark: 5,618

Average CPU Mark (V3): 5,516*

Average PassMark Rating
2,068

Rank: 3381
Samples: 2

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Oct 12 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 22nd of October 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Samsung SM-X820
 12,255
Alldocube iPlay60 mini Turbo
 6,315
Positivo Vision Tab 10
 2,901
Incar P08
 2,851
Skythtek N8_Plus
 2,623
Xiaomi 24075RP89G
 2,376
UJJ U6_EEA
 2,060
Askey ADT-3
 1,940
Fezawio F11_US
 1,279
Vivo 1609
 962
PassMark Software © 2024


Last 2 Baselines for Vivo 1609
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL812587 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068
BL812586 - Oct 12 2020 [OLD V3]
2068
PassMark Software © 2024