iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1902

General information and performance details for Vivo 1902 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Vivo 1902

Model Variants: vivo 1902

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 1,626

Average Mem Mark: 7,201

Average Disk Mark: 32,477

Average 2D Mark: 11,743

Average 3D Mark: 3,193

Average CPU Mark (V3): 9,326*

Average PassMark Rating
3,381

Rank: 1107
Samples: 10

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Apr 15 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 14th of May 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
ZNIR 1.0
8,432
Vivo 1902
1,626
VIVAX Fly5_lite
1,393
VIVAX Fly_V551
850
Huawei MYA-L11
843
HOMTOM S9_Plus
816
POLYTRON POLYTRON_4G551
808
Samsung SM-A107M
803
CUBOT NOTE 20
792
Samsung SM-A105M
775


Last 5 Baselines for Vivo 1902
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL806204 - Aug 03 2020 [OLD V3]
3398
BL801962 - Jun 20 2020 [OLD V3]
3407
BL801961 - Jun 20 2020 [OLD V3]
3267
BL801958 - Jun 20 2020 [OLD V3]
3455
BL801946 - Jun 20 2020 [OLD V3]
3356