iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1916

General information and performance details for Vivo 1916 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Vivo 1916

Model Variants: vivo 1916

CPU Type: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc TRINKET

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 3367.0 MB

Average CPU Mark: 2,479

Average Mem Mark: 14,039

Average Disk Mark: 16,319

Average 2D Mark: 23,970

Average 3D Mark: 13,628

Average CPU Mark (V3): 13,867*

Average PassMark Rating
5,393

Rank: 996
Samples: 6

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jul 30 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 17th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Xiaomi 21121210G
 6,476
Elo Touch Solutions 15in-I-Series-4-USB-C
 3,538
Samsung SM-G928V
 2,566
Vivo 1916
 2,479
Samsung SM-A136U1
 2,191
Blackview Pad 8
 1,660
Sprd m107_9863a_64_q_Natv
 1,611
Samsung SM-A013M
 436
DEXP S670
 352
Samsung SM-J320F
 295
PassMark Software © 2022


Last 5 Baselines for Vivo 1916
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8039483 - May 05 2022
6449
BL8009291 - May 19 2021
5049
BL8009290 - May 19 2021
5049
BL811803 - Oct 03 2020 [OLD V3]
5267
BL811802 - Oct 03 2020 [OLD V3]
5267
PassMark Software © 2022