iconcharts

AndroidTM Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1916

General information and performance details for Vivo 1916 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.

Vivo 1916

Model Variants: vivo 1916

CPU Type: NA

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: NA

Average CPU Mark: 2,418

Average Mem Mark: 14,498

Average Disk Mark: 32,639

Average 2D Mark: 23,883

Average 3D Mark: 13,640

Average CPU Mark (V3): 13,867*

Average PassMark Rating
5,271

Rank: 606
Samples: 3

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Jul 30 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 15th of May 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
SERN 5100
 9,031
Vivo 1916
 2,418
VIVAX Fly5_lite
 1,393
VIVAX Fly_V551
 850
Huawei MYA-L11
 843
HOMTOM S9_Plus
 816
POLYTRON POLYTRON_4G551
 808
Samsung SM-A107M
 803
CUBOT NOTE 20
 792
Samsung SM-A105M
 775
PassMark Software © 2021


Last 3 Baselines for Vivo 1916
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL811803 - Oct 03 2020 [OLD V3]
5267
BL811802 - Oct 03 2020 [OLD V3]
5267
BL805922 - Jul 30 2020 [OLD V3]
5278
PassMark Software © 2021