iconcharts

Android Benchmarks

Performance Comparison of Android Devices

Vivo 1935

General information and performance details for Vivo 1935 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest Mobile benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the device compared to 10 other common devices in terms of PassMark Android CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph lists up to the last 5 baseline submissions for this particular device.
Vivo 1935

Model Variants: vivo 1935

CPU Type: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc TRINKET

Number of Cores: NA

Total RAM: 7608.2 MB

Average CPU Mark: 2,453

Average Mem Mark: 12,958

Average Disk Mark: 33,370

Average 2D Mark: 14,698

Average 3D Mark: 14,672

Average CPU Mark (V3): 13,359*

Average PassMark Rating
5,243

Rank: 2697
Samples: 9

First Benchmarked in V3/V10:
Sep 29 2020

CPU Mark Comparison
As of 16th of August 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Device Average CPU Mark
Vivo V2507A
13,422
Samsung SM-F971B
12,953
Zebra Technologies TC501
8,270
Samsung SM-A3760
7,579
Zebra Technologies TC53E
5,425
Vivo I2404
5,245
Samsung SM-A176U
4,399
Vivo 1935
2,453
Xiaomi 2508CRN2BI
2,413
ZTE Z2466
1,415


Last 5 Baselines for Vivo 1935
Most recent listed first
Android Device PassMark
BL8098374 - May 09 2025
6543
BL8098373 - May 09 2025
6543
BL8097386 - Apr 18 2025
4240
BL8063916 - Jun 14 2023
5125
BL8047965 - Sep 05 2022
4591